Set up as below on D365:

Set up Project X with subproject: A, B and C

Create Purchase Agreement with Default project X -> Add items line: item 0, 1, 2 and 3

Create Purchase Order with selection of that Purchase Agreement:

Add the item 0, 1, 2 and 3.

As per the actual behavior from the environment, the linkage only happened automatically for the first item/item line which is between item 0 and Project X. The second, third, .. line is not linked to the default subproject once user need to manually reselect the correct subproject from line details. We would like to seek for development that this business requirement could be met when the Purchase Order item lines can automatically link to subproject respectively as following scenario:

Item 0 links Project X

Item 1 links subproject A

Item 2 links subproject B

Item 3 links subproject C

All the linkage should be automatically when user create Purchase Order

Set up as below on D365:

Set up Project X with subproject: A, B and C

Create Purchase Agreement with Default project X -> Add items line: item 0, 1, 2 and 3

Create Purchase Order with selection of that Purchase Agreement:

Add the item 0, 1, 2 and 3.

As per the actual behavior from the environment, the linkage only happened automatically for the first item/item line which is between item 0 and Project X. The second, third, .. line is not linked to the default subproject once user needs to manually reselect the correct subproject from line details. We would like to seek for development that this business requirement could be met when the Purchase Order item lines can automatically link to subprojects respectively as following scenario:

Item 0 links Project X

Item 1 links subproject A

Item 2 links subproject B

Item 3 links subproject C

All the linkage should be automatic when user creates Purchase Order.

As per the actual system behavior, we have 2 different ways to update the Requested Ship Date for 2 different purposes on Sale Order:

1. If we need to specify the Requested Ship Date for each sales line, we need to adjust the date from Line details then confirm sale order, we have nothing to do with the header here.
2. We can update the header to apply the Requested Ship Date’s change to all the lines belonging to that Sale Order.

For specific business requirement, customer want to have the change in Requested Ship Date on the header without override all the previous sales confirmation journals as changing Requested Ship Date in Line Details could be time consuming for a large quantity of sale lines.

We would like to seek for development that this business requirement could be met when the update on Requested Ship Date from the header does not override the previous sales confirmation journals.

Currently, For entities that have already transitioned from MRP to Planning Optimization, there are still some features that have not yet been implemented in Planning Optimization. Therefore, MRP remains usable for those entities/customers. Customer can either choose to use MRP or Planning Optimization from this point.

However, almost all parts of old Master Planning has been optimized/implemented within Planning Optimization and product group is encouraging customer to use this new algorithm. Subsequently some entities are blocked to go back to old MRP.

My request is to gather votes from community to accelerate transition progress from classic MRP to Planning Optimization as soon as possible in near future so that our customer have the best experience using this add-in.

As current design, we have list of tables which can be enabled Activity Feed Configuration. This is noted in public document from Microsoft:

Configure activity feeds.

However, Entitlement table has not been supported this feature yet.

With understanding regard operational practicality, we want Entitlement table to be enabled Activity Feed Configuration in near future.

Please help upvote this idea. Thank you so much team!