Pragun Katyal Consultant

Would be great to have a social and governance data model to capture all aspects of ESG evaluation and reporting.

Currently, editing a calculation model requires us to delete all the steps and nodes and build the model from scratch depending on where we would want to make an edit.

Would be helpful if users and developers were given an option to add and modify intermediary nodes without having to remove/reconfigure the existing steps that might come after that.

Currently, the automated update for goals happens on a daily basis, which sometimes gives an incorrect status update that a particular goal has been met when it has not. This is because there is no emission data being calculated for organizations on a daily basis, and the goals are analyzed on a monthly or an annual basis.

It would be helpful if the automation refresh could be set to a custom duration (monthly, quarterly, annually, etc) which would give users the freedom to set it up according to their needs. The current workaround only seems to be manual goal updates, which gets time consuming if there are a lot of goals being monitored.

Currently, the weight measurement unit is set to mtCO2e as default, which comes up in both the emission and the waste dashboards available in Microsoft Sustainability Manager.

It would be helpful if there is an option to choose the default unit for reporting on each of the dashboards. Organizations would be using tonnage (tonnes, kilotonnes, megatonnes) for waste reporting, and similarly varied units for their emission metrics.

It was observed that some emission factor values do not populate the respective areas in the final emissions. This was the case where the emission factors have Other GHGs and its respective units filled in, but the value fails to come through post emission calculations.