Marialecia Guada Suarez MICROSOFT ESCAL ENG

DAXSE 925329 Substitute item is not used when it needs to be fulfilled from another warehouse. Customer often has situation where: - main item has no stock in Warehouse on the Formula Line - substitute item also has no stock in Warehouse on the Formula Line - but, that substitute item DOES have stock on second warehouse and it has Item Coverage defined that says the stock in the main warehouse should be provided by Planned Transfer from the second warehouse So, they want a Planned Transfer Order created for the substitute item into the formula line warehouse so it can be used. But, what AX does is not as above... instead it creates a planned Purchase Order for the main item... NOT using the on hand stock of the substitute.

Purchase requisitions should work like purchase orders regarding the validation of “Max is enforced” parameter in the purchase agreement. They should consider to “reserve” quantity so if you have 2 PR’s are using the same purchase agreement for each their quantity and that sum exceeds the remaining, the validation should come up. The same if the qty is exceded in the same PR.

When you create a purchase order, in the creation form, you have a field to select a purchase agreement and it shows all the agreements effective for that vendor. There should be something similar in the creation of purchase requisitions.

A purchase order created from a Project for an item that has batch activated with automatic batch number and batch attribute assigned, during posting Product receipt system gives the following error: Purchase order: #### Item: ### Reservation​ Site=C00201,Warehouse=C00201.01​ 10,00 cannot be reserved because only 0,00 are available in the inventory.​ Update has been canceled.​ Product team assessed this (408112) and resolved as an unsupported scenario since the tracking group is using auto batch and the item is assigned batch attribute at the same time. In this case when the batch is auto generated when purchase order is posted the batch attribute is not created yet so that the reservation failed. The reservation process should be improved so that the batch attributes are ignored by the reservation process in this case and product receipt can be posted and consumed by the Project. Batch atributes may be assigned during registration or at a later stage directly in the batch number.

Item is a new one created in the system that has batch financially activated, batch number Group assigned with automatic number sequence. Site and warehouse enabled. A batch attribute is assigned from the Product specific form. A purchase order is created from a Project. Add a line for that item, confirm and try posting product receipt. You get the following error: Purchase order: #### Item: ### Reservation​ Site=C00201,Warehouse=C00201.01​ 10,00 cannot be reserved because only 0,00 are available in the inventory.​ Update has been canceled.​ In 408112, PG explained that this is an unsupported scenario since the tracking group is using auto batch and the item is assigned batch attribute at the same time. In this case when the batch is auto generated when purchase order is posted the batch attribute is not created yet so that the reserve failed. If the scenario is unsupported, there should be a validation that prevents adding an item with batch attributes and auto batch in a Project purchase order to avoid that error that is confusing for the user.

This report is currently available only for Russia, but it's a common need from multiple countries. Can this be made available for all?

When you create an inventory value report configuration and you select a dimension set that contains more than 2 financial dimension, you get a message that says: "The dimension set can have a maximum of 2 dimensions.". It would be great if this report would allow more.

Having the following number sequences: Product number: shared, automatic, not continuous. Item number: Per company, automatic, not continuous. When you import the Vendor catalog, the number sequence is not assigned sequentially when the products are released through this vendor catalog import process. The sorting that is in the file is not respected.

It should be possible to set up an email template with a body text and placeholders to be used when sending purchase order confirmation to vendors by email through print management.

When you're configuring a print destination in a report, let's suppose when posting the purchase order confirmation and you need to send it by email but to assign a specific file name, you must go to File section to add the file name and then set up the emails where this file should go. However if you forget to do this in this order, and you first enter the email and then go to add the File name, the system will ignore the email settings and won't send the email, just generate the file. This causes confusion and delays in the daily work, since if the email is not sent, you have to prepare the email manually. There should be a File name field in the Email section itself, so there is no need to to switch to the File section and the risk of the email not being sent.