Shwetha .

If customer is making payment more than 100rs (1^st limit) and less than 2000rs(2^nd limit) then first signature should print and if customer is making payment of more than 2000rs (2^nd limit) then both the signature should be printed.

I request you to consider the above idea in upcoming version.

Whenever there is workflow notification set by the user, the notification mail should contain amount in transactional currency and not in accounting currency as it creates confusion among approvers when they look into the mail notification and then PO.

Along with which it is also a tedious process to calculate amount and when there is different exchange rate involved to cross check the accuracy.

requesting you to consider the above suggestion in the upcoming version, as we think this needs to be the part of our standard functionality.

There should be a way to set up validation at the time of posting product receipt to prevent it from posting in previously opened fiscal period.

For example: Period 3 was still open unintentionally and several product receipt cancellations were performed which posted in period 3 instead of period 7 as intended. Are there any new settings to help prevent this? Maybe a warning message at least.

I request you to consider the above idea as we think that i should be part of our standard functionality.

Hello Team,

As per the current functionality we don't have excel add-in or data entity for uploading the details in bulk but most of the time customer has bulk data and they cannot add each line manually. Therefore, i request you to add excel add-in functionality in the upcoming version for smooth flow of day-to-day business.

Path: Go to Fixed assets >> All fixed assets >> Click on fixed asset addition.

Description which appears under tag 86 of bank statement should reflect on the line details of bank statement under line details as they are important for customer to recognize the transaction details.

We feel this should be part of the standard functionality therefore, i request you to consider above idea in the upcoming versions.

Currently we don't have any line level workflows for invoice journal in the standard functionality and we have noticed that the line level workflow is available for vendor invoice. Therefore, I request you to look into this as requirement in the upcoming version.

When we select depreciation as reducing balance method system should calculate depreciation based on the amount which is present at the beginning of the calendar year for that whole year. But when we are moving the assets from the legacy system to D365 in the middle of the calendar year say in the month of April system considers amount for depreciation which is present in the month of April as net book value and it creates lot of manual intervention for adjustments. Therefore, i request you to consider this as a product limitation and provide some feasibility or functionality where system takes care of the activity automatically instead of manual intervention.

Current design: While posting ledger to project transaction system is not splitting the sales tax and creating one line as ledger journal (base amount + sales tax). (the split is getting applied only on one leg entry).

for instance: User is creating journal line between project to ledger as below.

Project Dr - 1000 sales tax - 6.76%

Ledger Cr - 1000 sales tax - 6.76%

Voucher is reflecting as: Ledger - ledger journal: 1067.60(Cr), sales tax: 67.60(Dr), Project cost: 932.40 (Dr), sales tax: 67.60(Dr).

Expected design: While posting ledger to project transaction system is should split the sales tax from base amount and create 2 different line the way it is creating for project cost. one line as ledger journal.

for instance: User is creating journal line between project to ledger as below.

Project Dr - 1000 sales tax - 6.76%

Ledger Cr - 1000 sales tax - 6.76%

Voucher is reflecting as: Ledger - ledger journal: 932.40(Cr), sales tax: 67.60(Cr), Project cost: 932.40 (Dr), sales tax: 67.60(Dr).