Angela Do

With the "Enhancements to bank foreign currency revaluation feature", system is allowing the summarization at the journal name level and summarization on the bank account entry (by enabling Summarize amounts in bank account’ in your Journal names).

Accordingly, the system will ignore the dimensions because it would not know which ones needed to be put into the transaction.

As a result, when running Bank FCR, the voucher transactions will also be generated without dimension.

In Australia region, customer must pay for each bank transaction. By implementing “Summarise amounts in bank account”, it reduces the total cost against bank transaction. However, summarization cannot fetch the financial dimensions when running FCR. Meanwhile, turning off summarization function might allow us to track until dimension level, but it will lead to the financial impact with the dramatically-increased-cost due to paid amount per bank transaction line. 

Upon the above points, it's necessary to improve the function, in which the Dimension values can be retrieved in bank revaluation voucher even though FCR is run against summarized bank transactions.

We are unable to find the attachment for the invoice having attachment in the VendShowspecifikation.For further details, please refer as below: 

1.Post vendor invoice with attachment 

2. Create a payment to settle open invoice-> view marked transactions

-> Unable to find any attachment

Business justification: The end goal is to have the approver to view attachment (eg: scanned copy of vendor invoice) during vendor payment disbursement workflow approval process. So, they can validate vendor payment against copy of invoices that have been attached to the invoice form (when the invoice was firstly created by AP officer).

Only the active employees are available on the LeavePlanMassEnrollment form.

In our implementation, we are integrating this data to the payroll system so that employees that will be starting in the future (pending employees) has their profile fully prepared before the employee onboarding process.

Repro steps:

-Current date: Aug-20,2024

-An employee with start date Sep-1, 2024

-Go to Leave and absence plan workspace. Create a new absence plan. 

-Click assign to employees button. 

Result: The employee with future employment date is not available here. 

We would like to keep the consolidation transactions at detailed level with Main Account + Entity + 5 dimensions, while modifying the dimension combination for the elimination journal transaction at Main account + Entity level only. 

Currently, there is no function in Elimination rule supports this.

The current design of Manager Absence Calendar default View obtains:

-Date range within 28 days since today date. 

-View options having 'Without requests' and 'Leave of Absence' options to be disabled.

Our request is to change this default view in which the date range is within 91 days and View options having 'Without requests' and 'Leave of Absence' enabled.

Business impact: We need to show all direct reports for managers with and without time off requests/leave of absence (So they can see their direct reports working calendar/if their is a public holiday coming up for any of their reports - A lot of managers have staff from various locations so it is hard to keep track of all employees public holidays)

We have an asset with depreciation adjustment transactions created during life use. 

When disposing off the asset, system will always generate Depreciation adjustment to reverse the created ones, even we turn off all parameters relating 'Auto create Depreciation adjustment' from FA parameters and FA Book. 

That being said, as long as depreciation adjustment transactions exist during asset life, the same transaction type will be automatically created when disposing off the asset.

We need to prevent creating Depreciation adjustment automatically in this situation.

We have a concern regarding the Project management and accounting module.

Currently, the field 'Purpose' is neither filterable nor sortable in the Journal lines (Fee Journal), which is causing a challenge for us to search/filter by Purpose.

Please enhance the form design so that sort/filter function can be used in this field.

This is relating to KB975236, issue is unable to open Project invoice journal form for the Project which has more than 2000 invoices.

Currently, the workaround is to apply a filter to limit the results to less than 2000 records.

However, we would like to have the fix in the future releases.

Create a parent project and a Subproject. Same Project group but different dimensions. 

Register a cost for parent project.

Adjust the transaction, to move cost from Parent Project to Subproject. 

GL records incorrectly, original entry is not reversed.  

Expectation: the original entry should have been reversed, the correct accounting with proper dimensions to be created and post to subproject.

Currently, there is no validate before posting Free text invoice.

System does basic validation on saving, and other validations (Period open, Customer on-hold, Ledger setup correct, Correct tax groups, default project dimensions) on posting action.

However, there is a problem when using workflow process, so we want to simulate posting before submitting to WF and posting FTI, to avoid wasting time starting process from the beginning if the error blocks posting action.