Dynamics 365 Supply Chain Management

I have noticed that SalesOrderHeaderV2Entity got deprecated and released new entity SalesOrderHeaderV3Entity when upgraded the version from 10.0.35 to 10.0.36. All of sudden post upgrading to 10.0.36 import and export operations not working on Sales order headers v2. Looking forward for Microsoft to take up notice of this request and provide a fresh new document detail lists of data entities marked as obsolete on every new Finance and operations release version.

Minimum/maximum keys are no more supported in Planning Optimization according to the documentation.

It's a shame. Could you advice how can we plan an increase/decrease of the safety stock easily now? Do you plan to retrofit this feature in Planning Optimization?

It is really important to offer a feature to our customers in order to support business cases. Thank you

Having multiple product receipts and linked Quality orders generated for a PO line, D365 doesn't allow to register supplier's invoice against a product receipt for which the Quality order is already passed.

Example: For a PO with a line qty of 100, there are 4 product receipts, and 4 corresponding Quality orders open against them. When for the first receipt the quality order is passed and while other quality orders are still open, D365 doesn't allow to register a supplier's invoice against that product receipt.

When we create a Condition assessment registration on an Asset form, it shows all the templates, not the only ones for that specific Asset type.

More details: ISSUE 776334

The production order to release form (from Production Floor Management workspace) is based on material availability calculated according to master planning logic, working on dynamic master plan.

This is not working in contexts where production reservations are managed, and this is mandatory when WMS is implemented, where reservations for components are generated at production order Release.

Having reservations, this does not fit with the availability check procedure, because they are ignored. We can have cases where two production orders share some components and for some reasons the second one (in order of requirement dates) is considered fully feasible and, therefore, released. The shared component for the first order will be considered again available, regardless the reservation occurred.

This seems more a logical bug than an improvement idea.

Many of our clients want to use Production Floor Execution, after they removed the functionality related to time and assistance, but in a more automated manner without manually entering data to avoid errors.

Instead of doing it manually as is currently done, integrating the use of the scanner to be able to start the Jobs ID and report its progress would help industries optimize their processes.

In the BOM of an engineering change order (ECO): 

• I get an error message when I add a new circular reference, i.e. when I create a BOM line to add another version of the same item number. 
• However, I manage to modify an existing circular reference (created from the BOM of the engineering version), i.e. to modify the version of this same item number on the BOM line. 

In my opinion, this should be solved because it should be possible to create a second engineering version via ECO whose BOM contains the first engineering version of this same product (since in this case there will not yet be a circular reference to modify).

Reserved quantity in sales order line incorrect by using different sales unit

If an item is recorded in a different sales unit in a sales order and an automatic reservation is triggered, the value in the "Reserved Quantity" field will be calculated incorrectly - rounding differences obviously occur here.

b. This error occurs when the total quantity is reserved against several different item lots.

Reserved quantity in sales line incorrect with different sales unit:

Create an item with base UoM = pcs and alternate UoM = box. 1 box = 15 pcs.

Post three item journal lines for 38 pcs, 20 pcs, 2 pcs.

Create a sales order for 4 boxes.

Reserve

ERROR: Reserved Quantity = 3.99999

The current calculation is as follows:

38 pcs/15 = 2.53333 boxes (rounded to 5 digits)

20 pcs/15 = 1.33333 boxes

2 pcs/15 = 0.13333 boxes

That makes 60 pcs and 2.53333 + 1.33333 + 0.13333 = 3.99999 boxes.

SysQueryRangeUtil methods as they are described here:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dynamics365/fin-ops-core/fin-ops/get-started/advanced-filtering-query-options do not cover the customer requirements. The customer wants to filter for example all orders to be release to warehouse for the next comming 3 hours. WIthin the standard filter options this is not there.

In my scenario I want to setup query and filters for different filters and batch job to be able to filter and select based on time windows

At this moment there is only the option to do this by days and not per hour or minutes.

Below the missing options within the current standard

• (HourRange(-5,0))
• (MinuteRange(-5,0))

This would be a great added value to have these options within the standard advanced filter oprtions.

Today it is not possible to see/change the asset when creating related work order.

A workaround is to create work order, delete line and add new line.

Is it possible to show/edit asset in the form when you're creating new related work order -> Less work