Confirming purchase order with future accounting date with period on hold shouldn't block
System doesn't has to be block the user from confirming purchase order in future accounting date when the period is on hold for future. It is useful to validate the date for posting product receipt and invoices only. Example: For purchase order to create a product receipt into a closed ledger per...
STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes
Internal invoice number in number sequence doesn't have to be mandatory
That parameter isn’t mandatory as per MS design for posting vendor invoices, and it causes issues, we have an ISV involved in the P2P process (“ExFlow”), enabling that parameter will disrupt something in ExFlow.
STATUS DETAILS
Declined