Suggest a new Idea

  • 29

    Filter by field

    Suggested by Kurt HatlevikUnder Review 0
    Category: Common

    In previous versions of Dynamics, we could right click in a field, and select "filter by field".  I miss this feature, because it speeds up filtering in forms.  Can we have it back ?

  • 25

    File Based Integration Logic App Triggers/Actions

    Suggested by Brad EdwardsUnder Review 0
    Category: Common

    Logic app connectors exist for oData based integrations. However, file-based integrations require the user to configure HTTP calls to execute the various triggers and actions associated with file-based integrations. The following tasks should be supported with out-of-the-box triggers and actions:


    Inbound integrations



    • Enqueue a file as a message to a recurring integration

    • Check status of inbound file


    Outbound integrations



    • Dequeue an outbound message for a recurring integration 

      • Need two options:

        • Execute automatically when file is staged...i.e. "When an outbound message is generated"

        • Execute when called (i.e. for scheduled integrations)





    • Download the file associated with an outbound message

    • Acknowledge the receipt of an outbound message

  • 20

    Missing fields in data entities

    Suggested by Denis TruninUnder Review 5
    Category: Common

    Quite often current data entities don’t contain all fields from the base table (for example LedgerJournalTrans table contains 200 fields, but data entity LedgerJournalLineEntity contains only 40 fields)


    And that can cause a problem, because very often client wants to use some fields that are not exists in data entity and this is not possible without development.


    Can you change this behaviour – by default add all fields from the base table into the data entity

  • 19

    Re-introduce next/previous record navigation from any list page / details page on D365 FO

    Suggested by Prasad S V R S DUnder Review 1
    Category: Common

    In D365 FO, If business / end user wants to navigate to next record from any list / details page, it is not possible and hence he/she must go back to list page and then select required record to see the details of it.


    Solution: Same feature was available on AX 2012. If we re-introduce the same feature by re-use and tweak the code to support cloud based application would really helpful for business / end users.


     

  • 19

    Infolog is limited to 500 messages and easy copy is not available

    Suggested by Denis TruninUnder Review 1
    Category: Common

    Current infolog is showing only last 500 messages and deleting all other messages


    Consider the following job


    for(int i =1; i <= 502; i++) error(strFmt("line error %1", i));


    for(int i =1; i <= 502; i++) info(strFmt("line info %1", i));


    it will display only last 500 messages and status will be info instead of error(it can be the real case for example if we have 1000 lines in journal and first 500 contains an error – user when running journal check will see only last 500 messages and did not see an errors)


    The following problem with the current implementation:


    -no indication that error happened


    -not all messages are displayed


    -not able to easily copy all these messages to clipboard


    -Message limit should be extended(let’s say to 10000) and if the message limit is reached error should be generated to inform user that not all messages are displayed


    Users are definitely will not be happy with this "new infolog" as it is a base function(and it worked fine in AX2012)

  • 18

    File Base Integrations - Skip Staging to Target Execution

    Suggested by Brad EdwardsUnder Review 0
    Category: Common

    Recurring file-based integrations utilize data entities and the Data Management workspace to move data to the end application tables. The process is currently setup to first use SSIS to move data into the SQL staging table and then immediately execute the job to copy the data from staging to target.


    There are scenarios that require user input in the staged data before executing the process to sync data from staging to target. There is currently no way to model these integration scenarios. An option should be added to a recurring data job to enabled or disable the "Copy data to target" step. When disabled, the integration could have a status called "Staged" where a user could provide input and then update the status to "Ready to copy to target." At this point the integration job could pick back up and execute the final step to copy the data.

  • 18

    Secure attachments for certain groups of users or security roles

    Suggested by Volker DeussUnder Review 0
    Category: Common

    It would be great to have the ability to control the accessiblity of certain DocuRef records (probably based on their type) by a grouping criterion over several users or - even better - by security roles.


    More concrete: I envision this as an assignment option for security roles in form Document types with an option for read/write.


     


    Side note: We created something similar before in AX2012 (utilizing XDS) but it turned out to be performing too badly and so we needed to remove it and tell our customers we cannot fulfil this requirement.

  • 16

    Fix the Search on ideas.dynamics.com

    Suggested by Joel LeichtyUnder Review 2
    Category: Common

    Currently the search feature goes across all products, with no way to filter by D365FO. This makes searching for anything not feasible.

  • 15

    Bring back a functional Breadcrumb line

    Suggested by Henrik DallNew 1
    Category: Common

    Missing the clickable Breadcrumb line that we had in AX2012. The line is there in D365 but, as you all know, not clickable.

  • 14

    More options on numbersequences

    Suggested by Kurt HatlevikNew 0
    Category: Common

    Number sequences in D365FO currently support having constants and Alphanumeric segments.  In many cases there are the need of additional control of how the number sequence look.  Like the ability to have more formating.  This would make it possible for us to have check digits on customers/item numbers auto generated.  Or if items should have the format XXX.XXX.XXX.  


    Take a look at the Retail --> Inventory management-->Bar codes and labels-->Bar code mask setup for the functionallity that would be nice to have on number sequences.


    Can we have a "Masking" feature on number sequences ?