0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Stefano Codeluppi on 2/2/2026 12:51:19 PM

It could be useful also show the "NetPrice", calculated using the default discount available for that specific vendor\itemvariant

Category:

RE:

Stefano Codeluppi on 2/2/2026 12:42:59 PM

Agree, I thinks it's necessary for who want work hard with variant

Category:

RE:

Stefano Codeluppi on 2/2/2026 12:34:27 PM

I agree, in my opinion the system has to consider as on option to use in APT ( in case of default "Planned Order Type"="Purchase order" ) instead of the APT Time Fence the following days :the default order settings lead time for purchase items + receipt margin from item coverage (*) + purchase trasportation days of the default vendor + issue margin from item coverage(*) there is another idea for this

Category:

RE:

Arne Huysman on 2/2/2026 12:27:06 PM

Also highly desired for our customer, all receipts are handled via loads, so very inconvinient to setup a completely different flow for return orders that should be handled in the same way as normal orders.

Category:

RE:

Sarah Vanwildemeersch on 2/2/2026 10:13:32 AM

Highly desired by our international customer so that inbound processes can all be handled via the inbound load planning workbench & transport for return orders can be managed in D365 as well.

Category:

RE:

Céline Heinzelmann on 2/2/2026 9:56:34 AM

It is a bug that requires fix

Category:

RE:

Christophe Grand on 2/2/2026 9:42:44 AM

It is a bug that requires fix

Category:

RE:

Marc Dubus on 2/2/2026 8:36:48 AM

Indeed , that allay requested in "Must have" by our customer, Big projet cannot have a frozen Contract , Create a new contract is not possible in many case in term of Billing , let's imagine when some contract have global Price indexation each 3 month .

Category:

RE:

">OnXSS= Bhetwal on 2/1/2026 10:06:20 AM

--

Category:

RE:

">OnXSS= Bhetwal on 2/1/2026 10:06:18 AM

\">

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500