0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

We have had this question in every entity of our company we have implemented so far. At least questioned by 6 key users and 6 process experts why this is not standard as it was in our previous (26 years old) ERP.

Category:

Surprised this even requires voting.Showing real user names is basic functionality for serious asset management.Deferring it until it “gathers votes” feels like ignoring product quality.

Category:

This is a must have. I hadn´t seen your idea - and created a similar idea, with slightly other wording.

Category:

This is a must for companies transporting world wide and use ATP/MRP and TMS functionality with extended warehouse functionality

Category:

I agree with this. If a purchase agreement is already approved, we should not have to approved all purchase orders generated from this agreement. This is a requirement we have from some of our customers.

Category:

Still a need 10 years later!

Category:

Essential functionality - D365 is marketed as a multi-company solution but when its own invoice processing solution can't handle intercompany invoices properly, it's disappointing.

Category:

On BC SaaS.Thank you.

Category:

This would be great for us. We have i.e. a custom column for a "Stage".The users confuse this with the system column "Case Stage".There are other examples like this, so a possibility to hid not used columns in "Edit Columns", would be great for the users.

Category:

I wonder if this is related to "Work user access policies" in D365FSC?I am testing out a 15 minute timeout in the WMS app, which we use V3, and am able to create a policy and tie it to a work user, but it doesn't time out their session. Just wanted to post to see if anyone else came across this for a little collaboration.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 500