0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Really important and useful option to have

Category:

You're not alone, I agree on all points.

Category:

This is a great idea, I would really appreciate this new feature!

Category:

The issue is not the Functionality to loaf the voucher and set the parameter to "Yes". It actually works fine if in the accrual scheme which you setup you select a "New voucher for each accrual transaction".

However, there is a bug in the system when you select "Same voucher for all transactions" in the Voucher in the Accrual schemes setup. Then you create a General journal and apply accrual scheme which uses this setup , post the journal and later try to reverse you get double transaction lines if you select the parameter to show Accruals to "Yes". The workaround to get only the lines you need it to select the parameter to "No". However, this is against the logic of the functionality as in this case you should just see the main transactions.

So really the bug is in the accrual scheme setup in the voucher when you try to use the same accrual scheme" and it carries out to the loading the transactions menu.

Category:

Is this on any roadmap atm?

I have been waiting since 2019.

Category:

More specifically, we need to be able to search a product based on one or more of its attribute(s), wherever these attributes are generated through the Procurement hierarchy, the Commerce hierarchy or any other one.
Moreover, even if this functionality does exist with Engineering products, we don't want customer to implement engineering products only to have this feature

Category:

@Simon > the problem is, that we are using the jQuery to do that, but from unknown reason it is totally killing the Universal App. In Browser all is ok, in Universal App there are exceptions which kills the client - the client freeze and other side-effects. I communicated this with PG and answer was that I am not supposed to leave my iFrame of my addin... :-{

Category:

Please make it a parameter to activate/deactivate!
For my customer the original functionality is key, so they need to keep that master planning should use the negative value in replenishment.
Thank you!

Category:

In the old interface, it was so easy to see what type of entity the Regarding was. Now it's a guess and we have to open each regarding entity to see whether it's the contact or the account!
Please add this to UC. Our users are complaining daily!

Category:

Always though the option is valid for all subledgers!

Category: