Liquid error: Value cannot be null.
Parameter name: key
Microsoft Dynamics 365
voted for, and having it paid per volume may also clarify the multiplexing argument, which will come up for sure.
This is a must option, I really recommend MS to just integrate all together.
I am sure this change will be a very good selling point, when we show the Jobs to the customers they got afraid, a lot of customers skipped to use jobs.
I am dreaming to have more clarity & functionality also being a full project management module within BC.
This is typical of Building maintenance under SFG20 guidelines. An asset will have Monthly, Quarterly, 6 monthly and yearly tasks set out to maintain compliance within an SLA. It would certainly be a benefit when loading maintenance of an asset to the system that FS auto generates a service regime into the planner
Its very useful . now we are unable to generate PO information with amount
Are there any specific question types that you are looking at? We do have the ability to shuffle options in the "Choice" question type today - your options are shown at random to the survey respondent
If you click on the three dots in the choice question, you will see the dropdown option "Shuffle options", which when enabled, will show a random list to the survey respondent. Will that suffice?
We have recently introduced different header styles and branding ( with a separate "compact" style for header) and also a Toggle to completely turn the header off. Have you tried these? Would love to know if this satisfies your needs or what can we do to make it better!
New-NAVCrmTable for AL would be good -
1) powershell tooling is good standard :-)
2) producing "ready to use" updated objects with specified NAME and ID - and keeping any existing field ID (from previous object version) is good practise.
DataVerse integration is great - deserves A1 tooling, altpgen.exe is a bit rough
REMARK: Example diligence work, quality, efficiency.
The idea of Dual Write is to sync, but in this instance it will create diverging duplicates, Create record 10 in FO and you have record 10 in CE, rename it to 11 in FO and then edit it and it creates a new record 11 in CE, then edit 10 in CE and you have 10 in FO. Double duplication. I presume this is what you mean Valery, it is on my list to test!