There doesn't seem to be any technical constraints since the "automatic marking" works for those items (using consolidated batch orders, pegged supply, marking from MRP firming,...).
It is a rather odd design decision which doesn't make any sense functionnaly speaking.
It would be great if you would delete this limitation.
Comments
By making manual marking available for STD cost items, it would open up more functionality across our business. This would include inventory and warehousing management functionality.
Category: Cost Management
My company would like to use cross-docking, however I believe it's not possible since we use STD costing. Marking screen appears empty when trying to mark a SO to a PO line.
Category: Cost Management
I support this idea. Our client is using standard cost, but uses marking also for planning / business processes (since they have a lot of intercompany transactions between 3 legal entities - all tying together 1:1). Sometimes, i.e. if sales orders are recreated, it would be great to give the users a chance to reference the incoming supply (i.e. from purchase order) back to the new sales order or sales order line. This will:1) help MRP to generate activities2) help the users from a business process standpoint which purchase order will fulfil which sales order
Category: Cost Management
Marking is not only related to cost and Microsoft should provide us with using marking for std cost items as well.
Category: Cost Management
This creates issues when using WHS planned cross-docking, as this based on marking
Category: Cost Management