15
I've worked with two separate customers where the standard asset structure of Asset type - Product - Model for maintenance job type defaults has been inadequate to fully represent their assets. One customer maintained cranes, the other customer maintained boats.

In both cases each customer had assets of the same asset type, product and model but due to the longevity of the assets and obsolescence of parts, individual assets had different types of engines which required different types of maintenance activities to be carried out.

Is it possible to create a new field called "Model sub-type" for the asset record? This field should appear against the asset record and be included in the maintenance job type defaults table in order to accommodate different checklists to be maintained against the asset variants.
STATUS DETAILS
Needs Votes

Comments

T

Good idea

Category: Asset Management

T

Great idea!

Category: Asset Management