Can the address entity be updated to allow for relationships to be built? If you create a Country entity, you appear to only be able to add that to a primary and secondary address. No way to add to a tertiary address.
Comments
Thank you for your suggestion. We're already tracking this functionality for a future release of CRM. http://connect.microsoft.com/dynamicssuggestions/feedback/details/473252/address-entity-1-n-n-1-relationships Regards, Nick Patrick Program Manager Microsoft Dynamics CRM This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Category: General
This suggestion seems to be out here many times. I just want to add some clarification on what we would like to see. Instead of making a new post I am going to include it here. Account Hierarchy is great but if the name is different. When you have locations that are diffrent but the company name is the same that makes a tool like the address Entity (CustomerAddress) a almost perfect solution. The problem the CustomerAddress does not work as PSA, FS or other entities. Then we don't want to use the address entity. At a minimum address entity should work on all modules. The ability to create new releationships would be huge as well.
Category: General
Thank you for your suggestion. We're already tracking this functionality for a future release of CRM. http://connect.microsoft.com/dynamicssuggestions/feedback/details/473252/address-entity-1-n-n-1-relationships Regards, Shamiq This posting is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Category: General
Thank you for your suggestion. I understand the pain of not able to have 1:N and N:1 relationship with address. I know it will open up new scenarios for customers. This functionality is being considered for the next major release of CRM. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
Category: General
Administrator on 11/27/2023 4:41:46 PM
Thank you for submitting your idea to our ideas portal. We appreciate your contribution and the time you took to share it with us. We have shipped many enhancements since this idea was posted and it is likely that it has been resolved. If not, kindly reopen. Thank you again for your continued support.