Comments
I completely agree. MR has functionality that core BC financial reports does not. The BC reports need users to polish the report when exported as well as dynamic dates need to be fixed. MR has this functionality. For smaller clients that already user MR for GP, migration of those reports would be simple
The period closing process for the project module is useless if it doesn't block all postings. If additional transactions can be posted after the closing, inconsistent data is created in reporting tools. Closing vendor/customer periods is not a solution, as these are independent and should still be used for transactions that are not project-related.
MS should make the Asset Leasing module more flexible and practical than the current version.Our company has more than 2,000 mobile assets.Many of them are leases, and some are secured assets for a loan.A loan contract works similarly to the leasing contract, but we own the asset, not the financial institution. Therefore, when we terminate the contract because we can pay off the loan earlier, we do not want our asset to be closed. We hope the MS team will apply the enhancement, which will allow us to terminate the lease contract without impacting the linked asset soon.
Can we please add a control of turning this on and off for any given environment? Some customers might have build custom integration that also leverage the exchange integration between Dynamics an Outlook prior to this feature being released which could result in duplicate appointments being created in Outlook.
Also consider adding more dimensions-fields to pages, making fields visible for users and helping them remember to fill in fields. (ex. Item card, Subscription Contract card and lines, Projectcard)This could ensure that dimensions are associated to g/l entries and data more easily being maintained.