0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Marie Warnier on 11/6/2025 12:37:10 PM

I agree. This idea must be kept.

Category:

RE:

Claus Caspersen on 11/6/2025 10:26:27 AM

The comment from Administrator does not make sense.We are not able to activate "Partial ledger settlement" due to cross-year settlements between already closed years. But the Advanced awarenes feature has been activated since close of 2024.

Category:

RE:

Isabella Høj Lauritsen on 11/6/2025 9:22:21 AM

If this was added to the roadmap - the user would be ready to go after just adding a license and a security group in the AAD and thereby the task can be managed by only first level support. With +1000 users this is a big task to maintain.

Category:

RE:

on 11/6/2025 9:15:40 AM

I would like the validation NOT to be case sensitive, my customers don't like the upper case in the customer/vendor nave field.Also agree with Ricardo - make the accept function so it add the address data to the correct fields in the customer/vendor card.

Category:

RE:

Anette Wulff Nielsen on 11/6/2025 8:06:57 AM

This is already possible by using the Frequency 'Unlimited' and then create a period for example a year and then you can afterwards go into periods and split the periods like required.

Category:

RE:

Manish Patel on 11/6/2025 3:29:43 AM

We've had a few clients also comment about the same thing - the red asterisk on the PO is confusing for the user raising the PO. The above is a workable solution, or even if it was something on the Purchases & Payables Setup that would allow you to choose whether you want the field marked as mandatory/required.Most of our clients don't generate invoices from PO's, they only receipt the PO lines and then have solutions like Continia Document Capture to process their invoices, where they match to receipt lines.

Category:

RE:

JAVIER TORRES REINALDO on 11/5/2025 10:36:07 PM

It is also interesting that the behavior in the documents, both in headers and lines, is similar to the current global dimensions.

Category:

RE:

Steve Courcier on 11/5/2025 8:55:27 PM

Why is this difficult to fix? Should be able to rely on those roll up fields

Category:

RE:

Bert Faes on 11/5/2025 3:43:47 PM

Would be great. No further feedback on this?

Category:

RE:

Koen Heitkamp on 11/5/2025 2:15:01 PM

Good function on line level for both Sale picking as PO receive

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500