0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Marcus Nötzel on 1/10/2025 7:20:42 AM

This feature is fundamental in our implementation and would be very helpful to have, without own customization.

Category:

RE:

Claes-Henrik Andersson on 1/9/2025 6:40:13 PM

This is a great idea, so frustrating with those three reports to get a summary.

Category:

RE:

Cari Corozza on 1/9/2025 3:09:21 PM

Yes- please!

Category:

RE:

Mary Meacham on 1/9/2025 2:56:47 PM

Yes, please!

Category:

RE:

Chris Vine on 1/9/2025 4:00:49 AM

I think this is a terrible idea. You only want the user to be available once they are licensed etc.

Category:

RE:

Heather Roggeveen on 1/8/2025 11:59:33 PM

How many votes are needed before something is considered? 100+ votes seems like this should be on the list for inclusion.

Category:

RE:

Heather Roggeveen on 1/8/2025 11:53:28 PM

In my experience, the issue is that the field that displays the filter is only 250 characters long. You can go into the list and tick as many dimensions as you want. If the resulting string cuts off at a "|" or in the middle of a dimension, it errors because of an invalid value. If it happens to cut off in the right place, the filter works, even if a value is not showing in the filter.This really seems like a bug in design.

Category:

RE:

Alok Bohidar on 1/8/2025 11:52:10 PM

This is required for efficient picking process & is a must have for warehouse management process

Category:

RE:

Mariela Ilieva on 1/8/2025 10:29:20 PM

Thank you for considering this update, it’ll help a lot

Category:

RE:

Parker Davis on 1/8/2025 9:30:39 PM

This functionality would prevent errors and save a lot of time during the remitting process, eliminating correction shifts just to correct a scanning mistake.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500