0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Steve Courcier on 11/5/2025 8:55:27 PM

Why is this difficult to fix? Should be able to rely on those roll up fields

Category:

RE:

Bert Faes on 11/5/2025 3:43:47 PM

Would be great. No further feedback on this?

Category:

RE:

Koen Heitkamp on 11/5/2025 2:15:01 PM

Good function on line level for both Sale picking as PO receive

Category:

RE:

Conrad Volkmann on 11/5/2025 1:40:26 PM

And also consider adding a Tab in the Product information dialog that contains the Engineering attributes of the selected product version - this makes it available with two clicks in the context of most transactions.

Category:

RE:

Conrad Volkmann on 11/5/2025 1:36:34 PM

Ideally this should be combined with a possibility to tag those attributes that are important for production or procurement, because there should not be ALL attributes shown there. Look at my LInkedIn Post "Using engineering attributes for specification management "! if you want to get more context on that.

Category:

RE:

Gijs Timmers on 11/5/2025 11:01:00 AM

I obviously meant: 'Issues with api webhook notifications' ..much easier to solve.

Category:

RE:

Rhijnhardt Marais on 11/5/2025 9:17:11 AM

I do think this is a valuable feature and needs to be prioritized for the next Release wave!

Category:

RE:

Stephan Weidmann on 11/5/2025 8:30:36 AM

Still an unnecessary, wrong warning for pages with page type navigatepage - bc 26

Category:

RE:

Muhammad Zeshan on 11/5/2025 8:01:05 AM

Nice to have

Category:

RE:

Meenakshi Goyal on 11/4/2025 11:34:08 PM

This issue is showing quite a bit ambiguity in finance representation from accounting point of view. Should be fixed asap, would be great help.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500