0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Revaluation of foreign currency of Banks, Clients, Suppliers and Accounting in "Accounting Currency" is recognized in "Profit and Loss" accounts.

Revaluation of foreign currency of Banks, Clients, Suppliers and Accounting in "Reporting Currency" is recognized in "Equity" accounts, therefore this exchange difference in this equity account is transferred its balance to the following year in the process of opening.

Category:

This would help customers with a manufacturing site that have the need for this functionality.

As we can see by the vote numbers and comments, having this functionality would provide a positive impact to the customers of D365.

Category:

Can someone update the status? It was mistakenly set to completed when it is not and therefore no one can vote for it anymore.

Category:

We have a very significant client that needs this functionality, so I hope that Microsoft will reconsider this as an option in the future because this could be a huge opportunity for Microsoft.

Category:

A utility to more gracefully fix Duplicate Master Numbers than the current SQL Scripts would also be helpful.

Category:

FYI - We submitted a Microsoft support ticket on this, as it's actually a legal requirement compliance issue. We were told that the only way (using Standard functionaliy) was to use security roles to show/hide the Federal Tax ID field on the Vendor. However, that field may contain an SSN or EITN, or - just a standard EIN. It is neither necessary nor required to hide if the number is an EIN.


This puts undue burdon on the customer to either hide the field entirely to all but only a few roles, or - to perform a custom modification to hide or mask the Federal Tax ID field (only) when the Tax ID Type is SSN or EITN.


Microsoft should make this a standard parameter-based option in configs, so that the Federal Tax ID number will be masked (***-**-1234) when Tax ID Type = SSN or EITN.

Category:

I am not sure what this feature does exactly. I'm reading about the creation of voucher transactions wit a zero amount. For Dutch legal entities that is not required but also not a problem in my view. What is important is the possibility be able to post zero amount invoices. Based on testing my conclusion is that this is only possible for vendor invoices but not for invoice journals, invoice registers (and approval journals): Dynamnics throws an error message. A lot of companies process invoices for purchase order receipts using the invoice register --> approval journa; --> vendor invoice. In my view when you allow the posting of zero amount vendor invoices this should also be made possible using the invoice register.

Category:

Reservation should work for all types, also for special order. It will help to define if items are available also for special order.

Category:

Any update? Still "under review" by Microsoft.

Category:

Nice

Category:

  • 1
  • 489
  • 490
  • 491
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 500