0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Yuan Hao Poh on 5/12/2026 8:15:14 AM

Agreed!

Category:

RE:

Shin N on 5/12/2026 7:58:48 AM

Much needed!

Category:

RE:

Mees van Puijenbroek on 5/12/2026 7:36:15 AM

We really need this aswell.

Category:

RE:

Dennis Hagelen on 5/12/2026 6:54:25 AM

Fully Agree. Our company also has the same issue.

Category:

RE:

Damian Dinh on 5/12/2026 2:22:16 AM

Very good idea!!!!!!!!!!!

Category:

RE:

Ruth Gunn on 5/11/2026 1:56:09 PM

This is a horrible miss on MS's part. Many parent accounts have child accounts that manage their own ordering and invoice payments. 

Category:

RE:

Mette Thavlov Neukirch on 5/11/2026 1:39:36 PM

Yes please :-)

Category:

RE:

Claus Pedersen on 5/11/2026 8:12:15 AM

I agree that this would be very helpful and reduce time and risk of errors when doing manual picking.

Category:

RE:

Philippe Cabel on 5/11/2026 8:11:30 AM

I fully agree.Ensuring consistency between test and production environments is critical in regulated contexts, and the current limitation during major upgrades clearly introduces risk. A version-locking or opt-out capability would be a strong improvement.

Category:

RE:

Wisa Lerdmongkontrakoon on 5/11/2026 1:58:45 AM

I completely agree. It doesn't make sense that the deferral engine ignores dimensions entered on the PO line. In the real world, one Main Account serves multiple departments, which requires dynamic dimensions at the transaction level. This limitation forces the finance team into manual data entry and defeats the whole purpose of automating the process. Enabling this feature is essential to save time and prevent errors.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500