Microsoft Dynamics 365
I fully support the request as well. It's a must to have flash light available for remote assist. Not having this feature is reducing the benefit of it dramaticly!
Not sure why the filter on this report was removed as without filters the report is not useful and users cannot do any proper analysis.
This is an old and powerful report and in the Dynamics 2012 and earlier versions there use to be filter. option.
Filters are definitely required for Date range and financial dimensions based on posted sales invoices/Customer invoice journal. Please put the filter back and even enhance this report to make it more useful.
Refunds for both Cash and Check payments will be with Checks issued and posted by HQ. The refund check for an original check payment has to go on a 10 day hold to ensure customer check clears. So need to segregate Cash refund vs Check refund using two Customer account payment methods in POS. But running into this limitation.
We have multiple customers that look for this option.
For clients who need to analyze monthly data, for months where more than 1.1 million records were generated, the Excel Layout would not work. Having this option would make business central reports virtually limitless.
Fully agree with the request. We are using remote assist for machine inspections and engineers need to inspect the dark internals of the machines. The most requested feature is to have a light. Currently engineers use external flashlight, but this way engineers need to have mobile device in one and flashlight in the other hand.
We have created a Visual Studio package solution that does this very thing.
And it has been tested and used on Dev/Test environments.
So, it is possible.
The subject of the email should indeed be in the customers language, not your working language.
Please fix this in a (near) future release.
This would also be helpful in cases where the Engineering team is building EBOM (Engineering BOMs) within the PLM/PDM but there are components that will never be transacted on in lower level subassemblies. They could bring in the EBOM and make adjustments to convert to an MBOM (Manufacturing BOM) within the ECO. This will help avoid creating/maintaining lower level component parts within a purchased BOM that are just used by the Engineering teams design for the vendor.
Voted! We are really waiting for this integration to happen, this is highly needed.