0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

I'm puzzled as to why individuals (Person-type contacts) are excluded from the contact list. This approach seems counterintuitive, as many companies rely on their contact list as a comprehensive database for all connections, with the entire community participating in its completion. It's more common to encounter duplicate entries for individuals than for companies, primarily because companies typically have more distinct and well-defined information such as names, primary emails, and VAT numbers. In contrast, it's easy to mistakenly input the same individual with slight variations in their name or contact details, leading to data clutter. Given that the functionality already exists, it should be expanded to include all types of contacts. Additionally, other related features, such as the ability to merge contacts, could be enhanced.

Category:

Would be nice to display rich text by default in the notes.

Category:

We should have also an option to update open transaction (invoice / order /...) when customer changed mandate ID.Previous mandate is closed and new mandate is created, then mandate on all invoices not paid and orders created should change automatically (on demand)

Category:

will be very usefull

Category:

I can not see that this is solved in D365 13.02.2024.

Category:

This should be a standard function to be able to block bank account when customer has changed bank account.We should have option for active/inactive or end used date.It will avoid mistake.Also customer bank account approval process should be as vendor bank account approval changed.

Category:

I do not agree with this idea: Ledger settlement is not an easy feature already then if we allow multi ledger settlement at same time, it can be a mess to find ID settlement and other information. This feature must be improved as criteria for settlement or year end close process.. but to avoid mess, better to do it ledger account by ledger account

Category:

It's true. It's pretty ugly to set a complicated Hierarchy in D365FO. It represents a fallback confront to AX2012R3.

Category:

Seems odd this doesn't have more votes. This is a standard feature in a lot of webforms and websites. not sure why Microsoft has not included a setting to format Phone Numbers on phone fields. We be great to have clean data and formats.

Category:

Yeah, honestly surprised there not just a Microsoft Text field validation component. There are third party PCF Components you can install to get this working, this but wish Microsoft would build a system version of this. Especially for phone numbers. Seems odd we still don't have this basic feature.

Category:

  • 1
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 498
  • 499
  • 500