Comments
Dispatchers benefit from seeing the exact location of a Resource on the Schedule Board Map. Some other users (say Field Service Engineers) need to access the schedule board but not be able to display map pins for the Resources for data privacy reasons. This needs to extend to the address and long/lat fields on User records which should not be accessible unless you have a specific requirement. We can do this through Column Level Security but this is complicated.
We extremally recommend Microsoft reconsider not removing the feature, our business process is relying 100% on the blue plus icon to guide the users through the required fields for completing the process. Making the fields mandatory will prevent the record to be saved, blocking the user to save incomplete records.
I agree.Let's say, you have a N:N relationship between Tutors and Minors, and when creating the Relationship, select Use Custom Labels option with Tutors and Minors as the labels (so that you can identify them).When you open the Minor Form in contact, you'd expect to be able list the Tutors of this Minor in a subgrid, and vice versa, if you open the Tutor Form, you'd expect to be able to see the Minors for this Tutor in a subgrid.If you add a Minor in the Tutor Form, when you go to the Minor record (using Minor Form) you don't see the Tutor record in the subgrid. Instead you must click the Related tab, and from there, select Tutors.Subgrids should allow both sides of the relationship (just like Related).
When consolidating, we have clients that would like to consolidate on a transaction/detailed level to see which documents it is consolidating. It will also help the user identify which transactions have been eliminated and which entries require an additional entry to eliminate within the consolidated company.