0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

No news about this topic?In several companies we have implemented app protection policies, and Dynamics 365 business central still does not support these policies.Our customers cannot access the mobile app because it is blocked by the MAM policies in Intune

Category:

Dispatchers benefit from seeing the exact location of a Resource on the Schedule Board Map. Some other users (say Field Service Engineers) need to access the schedule board but not be able to display map pins for the Resources for data privacy reasons. This needs to extend to the address and long/lat fields on User records which should not be accessible unless you have a specific requirement. We can do this through Column Level Security but this is complicated.

Category:

Also, what is the difference between the recommended fields and optional fields, since there is no longer an icon to identify a recommended fields?

Category:

We extremally recommend Microsoft reconsider not removing the feature, our business process is relying 100% on the blue plus icon to guide the users through the required fields for completing the process. Making the fields mandatory will prevent the record to be saved, blocking the user to save incomplete records.

Category:

I agree.Let's say, you have a N:N relationship between Tutors and Minors, and when creating the Relationship, select Use Custom Labels option with Tutors and Minors as the labels (so that you can identify them).When you open the Minor Form in contact, you'd expect to be able list the Tutors of this Minor in a subgrid, and vice versa, if you open the Tutor Form, you'd expect to be able to see the Minors for this Tutor in a subgrid.If you add a Minor in the Tutor Form, when you go to the Minor record (using Minor Form) you don't see the Tutor record in the subgrid. Instead you must click the Related tab, and from there, select Tutors.Subgrids should allow both sides of the relationship (just like Related).

Category:

We have to have a Sequencing functionality in order to be able to utilize the MS D365 planning features - we are having to do manual Master Scheduling currently which is not good.

Category:

This is critical to our business as it will reduce changeover cost on production lines especially for Assembly. This is all done manually now and forces our company to schedule production orders out 4-5 months currently. This is a very tedious process that a system should do.

Category:

The inclusion of this functionality would be a great enrichment for many customers and highly appreciated.

Category:

When consolidating, we have clients that would like to consolidate on a transaction/detailed level to see which documents it is consolidating. It will also help the user identify which transactions have been eliminated and which entries require an additional entry to eliminate within the consolidated company.

Category:

Multi lingual is very important for this. Not all users understand English.

Category:

  • 1
  • 477
  • 478
  • 479
  • 480
  • 481
  • 482
  • 483
  • 484
  • 485
  • 500