Comments
Microsoft, I plead you take action to resolve this as it has been over 3 years your customers have been tolerating this. That is too long! Our users complain about this message all the time, among many other much worse bugs which cause work stoppages!! We also have began having this issue in the past year on multiple forms: Release Approved PRsOn Hand Inventorythere are others which I cant recall as of this writing. It seemed to happen after a version upgrade. Sometime around 10.0.31 and 33, i believe. However, it seems the issue has been occurring since 2020 for other customers comments on this issue log. We first started using F&O in August 2022, i do not recall the version number.
That's a very good suggestion from Thomas. Infact, I had a similar situation with one of my clients who wanted to deactivate unposted job planning lines and that inactive filter should apply to the CalcFormula property on few job task fields. Not only did we create a copy of these new fields, but we also had to make a copy of several other objects such as the job statistics, job details, etc. so as to print the appropriate totals.Requesting Business Central team to kindly work on this idea as it will really help AL developers to create dynamic metrics. Thank you!
It seems this was implemented, however it needs some serious work!FIRST: this may already exist, and I just haven't discovered where it is or how to use it, but there needs to be a way to mark lines as "reviewed" quickly in an entry either when it is uploaded or when it is manually keyed in so it doesn't have to be done line by line afterward.1) if you are "reviewing" multiple entries via the "select more" three dots, if you want to look for additional entries via different sorting method and click on the column header to sort differently, you will lose all of the currently selected items. Likewise if you click on a column header name and click "help" or basically click away at all before hitting "set selected items as reviewed". It's very frustrating!2) after you have reviewed, the "reviewed date" updates with the traditional US standard MM/DD/YYYY. However, if you export the list into excel, the date turns to the European(?) custom of DD/MM/YYYY. Either is ok, as long as they are consistent.3) It would be nice to associate some kind of user-defined ID with the reviewed entries. There is currently a BC-assigned "reviewed identifier" that seems to automatically set to the next consecutive number, but a user-defined character string would help to identify the purpose of the review.More to follow as I use this feature. It's exceedingly painstaking and slow. I'm grateful to have it, but it really needs work!