0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

It is a very good suggestion. We also need this.

The process of doing it one by one is very cumberson and time-cosuming.



Category:

good point @Nesrin, this functionality needs improvement, and this restriction appears unnecessary. I would have expected a restriction for the work to be related to more loads, not this.

Category:

With the redesign in BC 2022 release wave 2, the 2 fields (transation type & transport method) are not added to the customer or vendor card. The transaction type is available in the Intrastat Setup, but there is still no default setup available for the transport method.

Also, the fields are still missing from the job planning lines.




Category:

Any update on this feature? Still in design after 3 years? :-)

Category:

There is already a DelayedInsert- Property which should be enough, because modification is afterwards mostly done by Code, which saves records as required.

Category:

The Corrective Credit memo doesnt 'reopen' the sales order, so that is no perfect solution...


Category:

Add the possibility of being able to disable this function also in BC Cloud, like on On-prem, please.


Thanks



Category:

To expand on the above (I am the client), on the client table:


  • I can filter a view by the records existence in a segment.
  • I can filter by another field (e.g. by owner).
  • I CANNOT filter by the records existence in a segment AND another field.


So, I cannot have a view that shows contact entities that exist in a specific segment and owned by the current user.


When I try this type of filtering, I have a set of rows returned that do not match the filter. Also, some of the records are present in the result, but the detail is blanked out - producing blank rows. The rows still relate to an entity as you can then select the blank rows which display the edit screen for that record.


I could understand the filter returning an error, but this just returns a fault set of rows.


Category:

@arindam Banerjee - Do we have any idea when this will be implemented ?

Category:

I second this agreement.

We need better reports for auditing purposes.

Category:

  • 1
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 498
  • 499
  • 500