0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Ideally this would be the existing camaign entity that is still part of the "in-app marketing" of the sales app.

This way users of the sales app can also link opportunities to these marketing campaigns to achieve a correct revenu attribution.

Category:

I was told by support that addcustomview IS supported for offline but addcustomfilter is NOT supported.

Category:

Hello, this is pretty important for many customers, as they are sending Teams for several days. So booking requirement groups multi-day would be very nice. Are there any updates on the timeline?

Category:

Agree, this is a must to have feature in the tool.

Category:

Thanks Sai for raising this concern. It's very cumbersome to create a record which has dependencies from scratch when it got deleted accidently. Record with dependencies in model app have remove option but many a time user inadvertently click on top record level delete button and it delete the whole record vs dependent table sub-record.


Appreciate if microsoft team fix this feature as they did in sharepoint when user have an option to retive record back in case it got deleted

Category:

Links dependence on version is a nightmare for us. We may add 5-6 related articles on the "Related Information" tab to compensate inability of creating a table of content. As soon as related article is updated, it is not displayed on the front-end anymore. Instead of 5-6 related articles, we see only 1 or 2.

When we refer another article inside the body of the article, the link doesn't depend on the version.

Why can't you provide the same behavior for related articles links?


This bug also significantly affects references to internal articles which we don't display on the front-end. Linking to related articles in totally useless in this case.

Please consider fixing this bug!

Thanks!


Category:

This is for Sales Accelerator Sequences. The automated email function has been left out of Contact sequences and only available for Leads.

Category:

It's a little wider than that as there are many reasons why an engineer can't complete the Work Order and needs another booking.

  • no Access
  • Part needs to be Ordered
  • More time required to finish the job
  • Other tools required
  • etc

There is no way of doing this at the moment. You can cancel the booking, but it isn't actually cancelled at all and then you can re-book. If you set the booking to complete, it set's the work order to complete and you can't reverse out of this. So we need Booking Statuses of 'No Access' etc with a new FS status of 'Incomplete' that allows new Bookings to be created. Or a Booking Status 'Incomplete' with FS status of 'Incomplete' and substatuses of 'No Access' etc.

Category:

Would be easy at a minimum to allow option to send from owner of record or owner of sequence. now it's only owner of record

Category:

We have only just recently moved across to the system and I am utterly bewildered this is not already a feature.


The fact that its not already on the road map and requires votes I also don't understand.


As far as I an tell without this feature there is no good way of processing a credit/adj note for faulty stock sold to a customer without having to implement some sort of elaborate work around..


How does any business that deals with multiple stock items, deal with this now?

Category: