0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

I have already tried to contacted Microsoft with a service request but they just told me that - Yes, they confirm it is a bug but they will no do anything about it. And they recommended me to make this "idea" to fix it. If it got enough votes - then maybe.

I think it is strange since it is an error-link - and actually a bug!

Category:

This is much needed requirement for manage the dual write mapping for any big project.

Category:

We're having the same issue, Adrian. It would be great to get this resolved!

Category:

Trying again w/ WBS element outline.


0.0 Company

1.0 Engineering

1.1 Project 1 Iteration 1

1.1.1 Work Package 1

1.1.1.1 GitHub Issue 1 (eng team tracks hours here)

1.1.1.2 GitHub Issue 2

1.1.1.3 GitHub Issue 3

1.1.1.4 GitHub Issue 4

1.1.2 Work Package 2

1.1.2.1 GitHub Issue 5

1.1.2.2 GitHub Issue 6

Category:

Linked another similar idea:


Microsoft Idea (dynamics.com)

Category:

Hi Brant,


I upvoted your idea as it is similar to tone of mine that you linked

There is another connected request below - would you mind upvoting this one as well if it matches your needs?


Microsoft Idea (dynamics.com)


Thank you!

Category:

It removed the spacing; here's a try at the same info using numbered lists.


Company

  1. Engineering
  2. Project 1 Iteration 1
  3. Work Package 1
  4. GitHub Issue 1 (eng team tracks hours here)
  5. GitHub Issue 2
  6. GitHub Issue 3
  7. GitHub Issue 4
  8. Work Package 2
  9. GitHub Issue 5
  10. GitHub Issue 6

Category:

Can this be bumped in priority? Or, is there a programmatically way to build out projects from templates? That'd work in the interim. This is a step back; project templating is part of being CMMI compliant.

Category:

Fully agree, an operator who performs 2-3 operations per minute over a 7-hour shift, that's just over 1000 operations per day.


If you add in 2 seconds lost per operation...


2 seconds x 1000 operations = over half an hour lost daily, per user. Seconds count!!!

Category:

Wouldn't it be even better to change 'Expected cost included' to 'Expected cost only'?

That way, if you export/print the report to Excel it is possible to add totallings which is noq impossible as you'd be counting double.

Category: