0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Hello. We are also interested in this feature. It seems very straight forward but, as of August 2025, it is not available yet.

Category:

It’s rather ridiculous that Microsoft does not consider EU legislation as part of their roadmap. All companies using Business Central are wasting money on consultants to prepare for January 1st, 2026.Compliance is mandatory; otherwise, we risk a fine of 4% of our turnover.

Category:

Out of the box, Dynamics GP functionality lets you:1) create Parent>child relationships2) review Credit across the parent child group3) allow you to apply cash against the child when paid by the parent

Category:

This is a well used feature in Dynamics GP and so should be on the roadmap (soon please!) for Business Central to aid those customers moving from GP to BC.

Category:

yes, this would be helpful, and increase the performance. (the event subscriber will be active even if you check runtrigger = true, the onafterinsert trigger on the table / tableextension should only run like the insert - triggers. (Runtrigger true)you can create a tableextension for your own table, but for code maintenance the trigger directly in the table would help

Category:

We have to get this fixed, we cant explain to our customer that a function only works 'sometimes'.

Category:

Additional information: I would also be helpful to have information on which account structure the main accounts are set up.

Category:

We experience this issue. Timesheets post automatically most of the time, but some just stay sitting in Approved state - can't see a pattern, it seems to occur randomly.Would be awesome to see this problem resolved.

Category:

The idea is raised in 2020, It had almost 15 votes extra in the last 2 months. it's almost in the top votes and it's needs to have more votes? There are already ideas with less votes already in backlog/under review. When will this idea be under review or in backlog? :)

Category:

Good idea, I actually came across this problem fews years ago, I would also recomend extending the Sharing functionnality to add one new Type "Owenership"Only If the Owner check this box, the onwership of the record/projet goes to the person shared, when the user is no longer on the organizationAdilson

Category:

  • 1
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 500