0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Harrison Tran on 3/20/2026 8:46:26 AM

I believe this should be done, it brings a lot of benefit.

Category:

RE:

Robert Truong on 3/20/2026 7:42:59 AM

This helps a lot, thanks for the advice

Category:

RE:

Jessica Jung on 3/20/2026 4:51:23 AM

This caused a lot of confusion. Thanks for raising the idea!

Category:

RE:

Rolf van Rijn on 3/19/2026 9:05:37 PM

is this part of the roadmap, it would be beneficial

Category:

RE:

Rolf van Rijn on 3/19/2026 9:04:23 PM

We are going through an implementation with D365, the production pool was available in Dynamics AX 2009.Now we have to use buyer group as a production pool. thanks

Category:

RE:

Ganesh Chowhan on 3/19/2026 6:33:00 PM

This is much needed. Upvoting

Category:

RE:

Santiago Bronchales on 3/19/2026 6:06:21 PM

Compressing item ledger entries, or even Value entries would be very helpful. 190 million entries in the value entries is just too much.Would be also interesting to have something for those items that are obsolete in the system. In many cases items are getting obsolete and not used anymore, and after 5-10 years would be interesting to compress or even remove all related data without creating inconsistencies.

Category:

RE:

Ferdinand von Gaisberg on 3/19/2026 6:01:35 PM

Thank you Johannes for the creation of this request. I would be happy to use it some day in our environment as well! BR Ferdinand

Category:

RE:

Santiago Bronchales on 3/19/2026 3:43:50 PM

Great suggestion. We experienced issues on-prem until we adjusted this setting. Especially for warehouse users and other areas, they are forced to refresh, causing BC to lose state (filters, page, and context). This would be a must-have setting if we move to SaaS.

Category:

RE:

Brittany Burke on 3/19/2026 2:34:20 PM

This is an important one for accessibility!

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500