0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Dear Business Central TeamIt is mandatory since 6th of march 2025 (https://www.bmf.gv.at/dam/jcr:08ae63a8-0fc4-4818-a960-f76c9404ad26/BMF_Dokumentenversion_Zusammenfassende_Meldung.pdf), so having it planned for 2025 wave 2 isn't a nice customer experience. I've seen, with BC26.3 you already corrected "solei", but not dreieck" case ColumnNo of        3:          XMLFile.Write(StrSubstNo('%1', 'J'));        2:          XMLFile.Write(StrSubstNo('%1', 1));      end;Best regards, Martin

Category:

Hi,Could you please confirm that this scenario is linked with item requirements?RegardsMukesh

Category:

Still persisting in 10.0.44 - Issue noticed at Project purchase orders. Is there any work around?

Category:

I agree with this. Use Contains most often as well.

Category:

Totally agreed - this should be part of Base app. Defeats the purpose of the approval workflow then.

Category:

Yes I also feel that Sorting is required by default on newly created records otherwise need to spend time on searching.

Category:

Please put this feature back in. Technicians can't always manage a tablet and work tools so phone is simplier.

Category:

Sorry to say there are multiple bugs on the Bank Deposit Apply Entries screen. I meet with Microsoft today and I presented few issues. This is not the way it was working before Update to Version 26. The Applies-to ID was filled with the Check number (Document Number from the line), the amount to apply was filled with the full amount when you click Set to Applies-to ID (then you can change the amount to apply).Now if you fill in the Applies-to ID on the lines of the Application screen and forget the Amount to Apply will not carry over to the Bank Deposit Lines. And sometimes does not carry over having the Amount to Apply.From another side Sometimes works as before setting the Applies-to ID as the Document Number from the lines, other times the Bank Deposit number and the lines number concatenated with a '-'. I suggest Microsoft to review the whole process

Category:

Upvote on this request. This would be really great.

Category:

Could you please provide an update on the status of the following idea?We recently discovered that it is possible to delete production orders that are in the "Ended" status. Unfortunately, this functionality has been accidentally used by some users.For auditing purposes, it is essential that all production orders remain in the system. To prevent accidental deletions, we believe introducing a parameter to disallow the deletion of production orders in the "Ended" status would be a suitable solution.

Category:

  • 1
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 500