0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Correction: If you look at the documentation, the pop-up message is technically correct because even if the conversation is closed, it remains in the queue. However, this pop-up is still misleading for end users, who do not understand this and fear that someone else might take the call after it is “released.” Additionally, the message displayed on the timeline during an external transfer is also somewhat misleading. It only says “Customer put on hold,” which is technically true, but there is no follow-up message indicating that the hold has ended and the call was successfully transferred. This lack of clarification increases confusion.

Category:

wow i wish

Category:

great idea!

Category:

One of my clients has the same request. Please add this as a feature!

Category:

Team,I see the need for this in many businesses using catch weight. But I suggest that some will want to plan based on weight and some based on units. I would prefer to see a setting on the released product. This could be a True/False or a binary dropdown choice.

Category:

Can you make the dimension combination page "edit in excel" so that it is easier than putting on one checkmark at a time?

Category:

The opposite of an assembly order needs to exist for breaking down kits into individual parts. We have to cycle out the kit and cycle in the individual parts. Shouldnt be very difficult!

Category:

As of BC26, if one sets ModifyAllowed = false in the PageExtension (for example P31 Item List), it passes that setting down to the opened page card. So when the user double clicks the record or item no., the card is opened in view mode and can then be switched to editable!

Category:

Indeed this is a very basic missing feature. Always a shame to say to a customer that retainers/holdbacks are not covered in standard and require customizations.

Category:

Another reason for changing the current state in BC is the situation with renaming a user specified in Job Queue Entry via Codeunit9800 User.RenameUser. Even though the original user ID (already renamed) remains the same in Job Queue Entry, after renaming, the task starts running under a different user—the one who performed the renaming. I have already added my voice to this, there are already many applicants, so please: Change your behavior in this area. Thank you.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 500