0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

A utility to more gracefully fix Duplicate Master Numbers than the current SQL Scripts would also be helpful.

Category:

FYI - We submitted a Microsoft support ticket on this, as it's actually a legal requirement compliance issue. We were told that the only way (using Standard functionaliy) was to use security roles to show/hide the Federal Tax ID field on the Vendor. However, that field may contain an SSN or EITN, or - just a standard EIN. It is neither necessary nor required to hide if the number is an EIN.


This puts undue burdon on the customer to either hide the field entirely to all but only a few roles, or - to perform a custom modification to hide or mask the Federal Tax ID field (only) when the Tax ID Type is SSN or EITN.


Microsoft should make this a standard parameter-based option in configs, so that the Federal Tax ID number will be masked (***-**-1234) when Tax ID Type = SSN or EITN.

Category:

I am not sure what this feature does exactly. I'm reading about the creation of voucher transactions wit a zero amount. For Dutch legal entities that is not required but also not a problem in my view. What is important is the possibility be able to post zero amount invoices. Based on testing my conclusion is that this is only possible for vendor invoices but not for invoice journals, invoice registers (and approval journals): Dynamnics throws an error message. A lot of companies process invoices for purchase order receipts using the invoice register --> approval journa; --> vendor invoice. In my view when you allow the posting of zero amount vendor invoices this should also be made possible using the invoice register.

Category:

Reservation should work for all types, also for special order. It will help to define if items are available also for special order.

Category:

Any update? Still "under review" by Microsoft.

Category:

Nice

Category:

BC Product Managers: why are you dragging your heals on this? Should have been done in NAV09 when Shipping Agent was first introduced. I've seen worse ideas implemented with fewer votes. Can you fast track this please?

Category:

I'd like it to go back to what it was, where you just click anywhere in the email and expands, and contracts. No need to scroll to the top or bottom to get to the View More or View Less options. This just made it more complicated for users who deal with long emails.

Category:

Absolutely need this functionality in the PMA subledger

Category:

I would also like the button at both ends rather than one or the other.

Category:

  • 1
  • 490
  • 491
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 498
  • 500