0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

D B on 8/27/2021 8:28:26 AM

related discussion(s): https://github.com/microsoft/AL/issues/6741

I though it was .Net enforcing this, not AL, but now I'm not so sure; at least, the other user is insistent it's AL :-)

Category:

RE:

D B on 8/27/2021 8:26:41 AM

> On tableextension or pageextension objects, we are able to write to platform events like OnAfterAction, OnOpenPage, OnAfterInsert, and so on.

Those are triggers, right? not platform events. They just happen to have the same names :-)

I understand this helps with organising source code into related files instead of larger codeunits, but I don't know how well it'll scale, if lots of single subscribers mean making lots of small extensions and using up IDs accordingly. Also, it'll mean code in an extension object may not be movable to a codeunit later (e.g. if IDs are in short supply), as presumably it would have additional access to protected variables, controls, etc - which the codeunit would not. I've been trying to avoid putting stuff in extension objects if a codeunit could suffice, as it looks like doing so helps avoid coupling.

Of course, we'd be free not to use the suggested functionality! but just noting some potential issues it may raise.

Category:

RE:

Jonas Feddersen Melgaard on 8/27/2021 8:10:39 AM

I have a customer where this will make a big difference. I hope this idea will be taken up 😊

Category:

RE:

Neeraj Kumar on 8/27/2021 7:49:47 AM

Hi Kim Nelson!
Please update on the progress as the status is showing planned.

Category:

RE:

Piyush Jain on 8/27/2021 5:36:06 AM

'Sending' message confuses the user instead this should show more appropriate wordings like 'Processing' or 'Sharing the Screenshot' since the events are taking place at the backend and from the user point of view is it giving different understanding

Category:

RE:

D B on 8/26/2021 3:12:32 PM

This should be reopened, since nowadays, requests for code analysis rules on the AL Issues repo get closed, and the users get told to post them here instead...

Category:

RE:

D B on 8/26/2021 3:11:28 PM

I would rather support inline declaration, instead of the old var block, e.g.

local procedure Foo()
begin
var Bar: Boolean := SomeComplexBunchOfTestsAndCalls();

if Bar then
Flump();
end;

Category:

RE:

Carolin Lichtenmair on 8/26/2021 2:02:29 PM

Here's the link to the regarding forum discussion: https://community.dynamics.com/365/marketing/f/dynamics-365-for-marketing-forum/418313/form-matching-strategy

I would recommend to add the field "statecode" to the "Lead Mapping"-Fields, so that customers can decide if they want to match inactive or active leads.

Category:

RE:

Sebastiaan van Mierlo on 8/26/2021 1:49:22 PM

Hello Mike,

Does this include the action bar of the role center. In Dynamics NAV you could create multiple "menu-groups" in the navigation pane. With the BC Webclient, you can still add pages or actions to the role center, but you cannot group them anymore, unless it's programmed.

Category:

RE:

Ola Qamhieh on 8/26/2021 1:37:50 PM

i have to agree as the variant code is too small and the ability to add it from multiple dimension or attribute

Category: