0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

We should have also an option to update open transaction (invoice / order /...) when customer changed mandate ID.Previous mandate is closed and new mandate is created, then mandate on all invoices not paid and orders created should change automatically (on demand)

Category:

will be very usefull

Category:

I can not see that this is solved in D365 13.02.2024.

Category:

This should be a standard function to be able to block bank account when customer has changed bank account.We should have option for active/inactive or end used date.It will avoid mistake.Also customer bank account approval process should be as vendor bank account approval changed.

Category:

I do not agree with this idea: Ledger settlement is not an easy feature already then if we allow multi ledger settlement at same time, it can be a mess to find ID settlement and other information. This feature must be improved as criteria for settlement or year end close process.. but to avoid mess, better to do it ledger account by ledger account

Category:

It's true. It's pretty ugly to set a complicated Hierarchy in D365FO. It represents a fallback confront to AX2012R3.

Category:

Seems odd this doesn't have more votes. This is a standard feature in a lot of webforms and websites. not sure why Microsoft has not included a setting to format Phone Numbers on phone fields. We be great to have clean data and formats.

Category:

Yeah, honestly surprised there not just a Microsoft Text field validation component. There are third party PCF Components you can install to get this working, this but wish Microsoft would build a system version of this. Especially for phone numbers. Seems odd we still don't have this basic feature.

Category:

Anyone have thoughts on why this wasn't applied to the Download package option on normal/ad-hoc DMF jobs? They still export a headers-only delimited file, or an XML file with empty elements/attributes

Category:

Since posting this request, I have determined that Allocation Accounts assigned to purchase documents is working as requested by reassigning only the dimension indicated in the allocation account. All other dimension values appear to be preserved. These allocation accounts for dimension reassignment also appear to be working as I hoped when a deferral code is assigned to the document line. This is GREAT!However, I still can't seem to get the results I need when using Allocation Account in recurring gen journal for line type of BD Balance by Dimension. Maybe what I am expecting to happen is not realistic. In fact, if we use the Allocation Account on the purchase document line as explained above, we have no need to do reallocations monthly with a recurring journal. May be a mute point.If anyone else can add additional information using the allocation account with recurring journal, I would appreciate it.

Category:

  • 1
  • 492
  • 493
  • 494
  • 495
  • 496
  • 497
  • 498
  • 499
  • 500