0

on
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

RE:

Tim Tran on 4/21/2026 3:42:37 AM

Great idea! Please see this and improve our platform @msft

Category:

RE:

Alexander Gladkov on 4/20/2026 4:56:23 PM

IRIS User ID is linked to BC user, and it was done by purpose, because on the IRS's side IRIS User ID is linked to person's account, and not company account.So different BC users can have different IRIS User IDs.

Category:

RE:

Iñaki Fernandez Perez on 4/20/2026 2:35:40 PM

Great Idea. What surprised me is how much time has been this opened without a solution. I have several customers claiming for this. Voted Thank you

Category:

RE:

Nicholas Talsma on 4/19/2026 5:16:31 PM

This would be especially helpful since there is no valid ability to copy from an environment with managed solutions over an environment with the unmanaged counterparts with either of the available copy options.

Category:

RE:

Maria Alejandra MOYA on 4/17/2026 3:03:54 PM

This is one of the most important features to understand our audience. Please, bring it back as soon as possible, because we have so many teams asking for this !

Category:

RE:

John Brian on 4/17/2026 2:27:05 PM

Hello, you should configure the suppliers as 'Header only' so it doesn't need to consider lines.

Category:

RE:

John Brian on 4/17/2026 2:23:20 PM

Credits also need to be picked up as negative values so that they can be processed in D365.

Category:

RE:

John Brian on 4/17/2026 2:20:06 PM

The drop down should also have some information about product, procurement category, quantity, value, orderer. The drop down with just PO numbers in has limited use when the invoice does not specify the purchase order number.

Category:

RE:

John Brian on 4/17/2026 2:11:49 PM

Completely agree and thank you for raising. I had the idea of Vendor+Invoice number but adding legal entity is a worthy suggestion

Category:

RE:

Andrew Birch on 4/17/2026 12:02:06 PM

This is causing a significant issue for several of our customers. I don't think its acceptable for core finance function to ignore financial calendars. This needs to be added to the roadmap and addressed ASAP as the application of IFRS 16 regulations at the start of financial years will drive more and more customers to use this functionality and find that it does not confirm to the accounting conventions of the rest of D365.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • … 500