0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

T'ítulo correto registro F500

Category:

I would like Microsoft Look into this ideas seriously and urgently needed to have approval workflow features for recurring journal

Category:

This is normally a standard feature to reflect an organization’s domain, enhancing brand consistency and trust and should definitely be prioritized in MS CI Journeys!

Category:

Hi Supply Planning TeamJust let me know, if you need any further information. Just to line out the importance again, this feature is highly valuable for all of Microsofts manufacturing customers because it closes a long-standing gap in material planning. Many manufacturers rely on the simple but effective sawtooth principle for replenishment, balancing reorder points with maximum levels. Without this functionality, D365 forces companies into workarounds that lead to early procurement, excess inventory, and distorted planning signals. By introducing a coverage code that truly respects Reorder Point and Max. stock levels, customers can achieve leaner inventories, reduced working capital, and more reliable replenishment aligned with real-world practices. This improvement would directly support global standards in material planning (ABC/XYZ, DDMRP) and deliver tangible value for manufacturing companies using D365.Thanx for your votes!

Category:

Hi,Yes, please kindly add this feature. It used to work in AU version without need to do anything. But in version 26, it no longer work. Our customer is complaining. Kindly add back this feature. It can be a setup just like the post G/L description to GL Entries. Thanks alot.

Category:

Same issue. Please, solve it.

Category:

It is required for the IT audit purpose. Because auditor always ask to have workflow approval matrix. So, it should have in Microsoft Dynamics 365 for IT / organization audit compliance.

Category:

The workflow approval matrix setup in D365 is always required to be shared with auditors

Category:

Dear Business Central TeamIt is mandatory since 6th of march 2025 (https://www.bmf.gv.at/dam/jcr:08ae63a8-0fc4-4818-a960-f76c9404ad26/BMF_Dokumentenversion_Zusammenfassende_Meldung.pdf), so having it planned for 2025 wave 2 isn't a nice customer experience. I've seen, with BC26.3 you already corrected "solei", but not dreieck" case ColumnNo of        3:          XMLFile.Write(StrSubstNo('%1', 'J'));        2:          XMLFile.Write(StrSubstNo('%1', 1));      end;Best regards, Martin

Category:

Hi,Could you please confirm that this scenario is linked with item requirements?RegardsMukesh

Category:

  • 1
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 500