0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Hi H M,


Some users in my environment have also suggested this idea!


To add to this idea, it would be great to have an Annotation "Edit" mode button, where all annotations have MRTK bounding boxes highlighted on all the arrows so that they can be moved.


On top of this, it would be amazing if we could use the eye controls and voice commands to say, "Move this" (looking at an arrow) and then say "There" (looking at the spot) to edit the placed arrow's position.


This would be a great use of the "Eye tracking, target positioning" available in the MRTK tools, and an excellent addition to Remote Assist if implemented!

Category:

Maybe I should have used the keyword "lock table" instead of "disable access to tables", but the idea is the same.

Category:

This causes unnecessary workarounds and delays in Procurement. The PR allows multiple vendors, which logically implies that the capability to convert individual approved lines should be standard behavior.

Category:

this is an urgent requirement as the business must perform manual workarounds to split the PR's

Category:

I also had a support ticket open for it (2209220050000685) and the outcome was the following:


We have an update from the team that this by design the form type event registration will not support double optin type in the form there is a bug opened for this to remove the option from the form. 


Therefore this feature would be more important than before.

Category:

Fully agree. The forced changes to one-voucher functionality are causing issues all over the place. I understand why the changes are being made but there are very valid scenarios where it is still required, and I really hope that Microsoft listens to their users as there is a LOT of feedback about this.


We are currently over-riding the changes by toggling the setting "Allow multiple transactions within one voucher" to Yes, but dread the day that it is removed. (General ledger > Ledger setup > General ledger parameters > Ledger).

Category:

It could be interesting to also allow for the use of landed cost and voyage instead of TMS load in the purchasing company.

Category:

"Working as its designed to function" according to Microsoft on the issue 407146 - if it was designed to function this way then it was designed poorly. There is no reason that the description for the first line on the invoice would have any relevance to the subsequent lines on the invoice. If this is something that isn't going to be fixed it would be better to just have a generic "Free text invoice" voucher description to avoid confusion.

Category:

any news on this?

Category:

Any news regarding the post?

Category: