Comments
In addition to the BOM postings, the bigger problem, in my opinion, is that the financial dimensions of the resource and the costing sheet override the financial dimensions of the production order.This leads to completely incorrect financial dimension postings and destroys any cost accounting model.Furthermore, it is very misleading that the system behaves in exactly the opposite way for materials compared to resources and inflow postings.
I will add that while in the old client you could save a list, and the custom column layout would be saved with it, it was tedious to try and make the column layout the same everywhere, if that's what you wanted. It's kind of a pain in the neck if you want all columns laid out the same, to add or remove one column means you're making that edit on every saved list, so I'd like to add that if this feature was something that was under consideration, we'd love a toggle that would force all saved lists to follow their master column layout.
Financial dimension defaults form a large part of the key controls to ensure financial accuracy of data entered into F&O. All modules should be fully integrated and aligned with these rules.Therefore the Subscription Billing module should be aligned with the Financial dimension framework including using the default Dimension values.This idea specifically mentions Site Dimension values. I would also include Main Account Default Dimension values as a top priority!
Good idea! It would be really helpful if reports that are legacy or planned for removal were clearly labeled as “Legacy” or “Deprecated.” This kind of visibility would help users especially those not actively using these reports, avoid confusion and prevent investing time in features that are being phased out. A simple label would go a long way in improving clarity and user experience.