0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

Team,I see the need for this in many businesses using catch weight. But I suggest that some will want to plan based on weight and some based on units. I would prefer to see a setting on the released product. This could be a True/False or a binary dropdown choice.

Category:

Can you make the dimension combination page "edit in excel" so that it is easier than putting on one checkmark at a time?

Category:

The opposite of an assembly order needs to exist for breaking down kits into individual parts. We have to cycle out the kit and cycle in the individual parts. Shouldnt be very difficult!

Category:

As of BC26, if one sets ModifyAllowed = false in the PageExtension (for example P31 Item List), it passes that setting down to the opened page card. So when the user double clicks the record or item no., the card is opened in view mode and can then be switched to editable!

Category:

Indeed this is a very basic missing feature. Always a shame to say to a customer that retainers/holdbacks are not covered in standard and require customizations.

Category:

Another reason for changing the current state in BC is the situation with renaming a user specified in Job Queue Entry via Codeunit9800 User.RenameUser. Even though the original user ID (already renamed) remains the same in Job Queue Entry, after renaming, the task starts running under a different user—the one who performed the renaming. I have already added my voice to this, there are already many applicants, so please: Change your behavior in this area. Thank you.

Category:

René Hoekstra on Viva Engage: Cancel / RAF batchorder without any posting/transactions Posted in Manufacturing on Nov 19, 2025FHD:Adding a status Cancelled to the production order would also be beneficial, rather than just delete it.

Category:

I am reaching out to kindly request a reconsideration of the previously rejected feature proposal related to Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central.In our customer projects, we regularly face the need to procure external resources and allocate them accurately within the project cost and billing structure. This is a recurring requirement across multiple implementations. The absence of this capability in the standard solution forces us to rely on workarounds, customizations, or manual processes. These approaches introduce additional effort, increase the risk of inconsistencies, and reduce transparency for both partners and customers.Enabling this feature would significantly improve project accounting, enhance the usability of Business Central in service-oriented scenarios, and reduce the need for extensions that solve a common and recurring business need. From our perspective, this functionality is not a niche request but a core requirement in modern project-based businesses.We would highly appreciate it if you could re-evaluate this request and consider including the feature in an upcoming release of Business Central.Thank you very much for your time and for continuously improving the product. Please let me know if additional details or use cases would be helpful.

Category:

There's already an idea proposed for this functionality that doesn't have many votes yet.https://experience.dynamics.com/ideas/idea/?ideaid=839a3e83-55eb-ec11-b5cf-0003ff45a05b

Category:

Yes please! In our case, the sender is often indicative of which team response actions should go to.

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 500