0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

+1 here - in Retail this is essential.

Category:

Consistent with the idea: Improving Sale Orders information on Form “Load planning workbench” from Wojciech Bonowski.

Category:

I agree that this would be helpful for load planners either before or after a shipment is created to reduce the effort to consolidate or combine loads. When a load has many shipments, planners must currently navigate to each shipment from the Load planning workbench and "Transfer to existing load."

Category:

I agree that this would be a valuable extension to improve the inbound receiving process. Any warehouse or distribution center with multiple inbound docks or bays cannot lose visibility to material in the Default receipt location prior to it being moved or put-away.

Category:

Agree with Maurice Cohen

Category:

We are going live soon with standard costing and ended up having to create our own extension to perform this same requirement.

Category:

I mean Report 208!

Category:

Yes Report Needs a ReDesign. If you work with Extendet Text in Word Layout there is a Zero (0). Please fix the Data Set.

Category:

This is such a pain-point for all customers I've worked with. Both in F&O and in Talent.
I haven't met a single customer who want to register a specific timestamp for employment start or end dates, position assignment dates etc.
On the contrary they are all spending a lot of time figuring out which start and end times should be used in order for dates to appear the same in all company sites across the world. And ongoing a lot of time to adjust date+times that were entered wrongly.

Category:

I don't agree on this.
For the scenario where an employee is sent on garden leave, you would want the position assignment end date to be the last day worked date - but the compensation expiration date to be the termination date.

Category: