0
Category:
STATUS DETAILS

Comments

BC Team - if you do consider implementing this method, please also consider an overload like the following. I believe this would cover another very common developer scenario.


Text.Join(Separator: Text; RecordVariant: Variant; FieldNo: Integer)

Category:

Agreed, many entities are facing this issue currently. Such a feature will be really helpful and useful.

Category:

Only after posting the comment, I realized that the idea is in the F&O category, not Business Central. I can't delete the comment, so let it be here as a reminder that we experience similar issues. :-)

Category:

Comments in this idea brought my attention to the "3 dots", so it's great that the functionality is there, not so intuitive however for someone who is used with pivot tables in excel. :)


vote! :)

Category:

I prepared my description for the same idea, but then found that there is one already, so I will upvote and add my comments.

Account Schedule KPI in Financial Reports is a good example of this kind of set update.


https://github.com/microsoft/BusinessCentralApps/blob/main/App/Layers/W1/BaseApp/Finance/FinancialReports/AccSchedKPIEventHandler.Codeunit.al


Here, the web service setup is updated when a G/L Budget is changed. To track budget changes, the event handler codeunit subscribes to database insert / update / delete events, which forces ModifyAll and DeleteAll to trigger separate Update / Delete statements on each record, and Insert operation will not collect the bulk insert buffer. This can greatly undermine performance of massive updates - especially ModifyAll and DeleteAll operations.

These updates could be triggered once after DeleteAll or ModifyAll is executed and avoid subscribers bound to OnAfterDeleteEvent and OnAfterModifyEvent - if Business Central platform published such events.

I suggest to introduce two database events: OnAfterDeleteSet and OnAfterModifySet.


OnAfterDeleteSet event should be called after Delete or DeleteAll statement is executed.

Respectively, OnAfterModifySet should be invoked after Modify or ModifyAll.

Events can have the following signature:

OnAfterDeleteSet(RecRef: RecordRef)

OnAfterModifySet(RecRef: RecordRef)


The primary key of the RecRef is initialized only if the event is triggered by an operation on a single record (Delete or Modify). When the event is invoked from bulk operations, the primary key remains uninitialized, but filters from the source record are transferred to the RecRef, so the client subscribing to the even can retrieve the range of affected records.

Category:

Yes, similar to the option Settle remainder in AP/AR modules.

It would be great to have the possibility here as well.

Category:

It would really be beneficial if Team Members could add comments or notes, taking into account that a Team Member can be an approver for a document, then this is important to have an ability to add comments.

Category:

Hello,

In my opinion, the problem is not just a matter of inattention, but this option is too easy to use even for a malicious user.

So, it would be better to consider a password set for one or more specific users, who, knowing it, can take on the burden and responsibility of such a destructive action. Double confirmation can save you from a large percentage of occasions, but it doesn't protect you from a malicious and deliberate action

Category:

The transaction should not be posted if voucher with same voucher for multiple lines number even though vendor and its offset account is selected(offset account is selected later)

Category:

All legal entities should have this please

Category:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 500