Possibility to use quality association for Kanban items in order to generate Quality order
Hello,
It will be very interesting to have the possibility to user Quality association for Kanban items in order to generate Quality order
Thanks
Production floor execution - ability to report issues on production floor (cases)
Imagine a big production floor and something is or went wrong. For example shortage of materials / scrap materials / wrong materials delivered. It would be nice to be able to report the issue and continue working. It could be and option to use CASE MANGEMENT for that. In this way the productio...
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
Program manager, Microsoft
Vendor production orders.. allow to create them via firming
The vendor production order can be created manually or automatically by putting an assembly or a mfg item in the BOM with line type "vendor". We want a third way to create them: via firming of planned production orders. This is a more natural way in my view. The buyers are responsible for these ...
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM, Microsoft
Half day for special day
For time and attendance special day, we need half day because we have employees with 4 and half day work calendar. When we have a special day we give a full day but spent on two days. As example: normal calendar is from monday to thurday 8h-17h and friday from 8h -12h. When we have a special d...
Thank you for your feedback.
This is a great suggestion! We will consider this in our roadmap.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann, Program Manager
Microsoft.
Use the job card device without the whole time and attendance functionality
Some businesses want to use the job card device basically as a tool to execute and track real-time production and provide instructions and guidance to the floor. They may not have the need to control time and attendance of production workers at all. Sometimes they'd like to but they are not st...
Thank you for your feedback.
We do not have in our current plans to enable separation of the use of the Job Card Device from the time and attendance functionality. However, for customers who do not use the time and attendance functionality it is now possible to set up the Approve and Transfer process as a recurrent batch job. This is done from the update menu in the Approve form. In this case you need to setup a recurrent batch job for "Approve all" and "Transfer all". It is not enough only to set it up for "Transfer all", because the registrations need to be approved first when using this functionality. In this type of scenario it is recommended to use a time profile without Clock-in and Clock-out. This way you ensure that the calculation in the approve form is not failing due to missing absence codes.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM,
Microsoft.
New BOM line on WO doesn´t copy measurement fields
It would be better for the user, if the measurement data was populated from the product information when added to the BOM of a specific WO. Now, if a new Ãtem is added to the BOM of a specific WO, measurement fields are not copied from the product information. However, if the Ãte...
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
'Johan Hoffmann
PM, Microsoft
Add a parameter setting that allows the user to choose if the picking list should register with the product being produced or with the input product financial dimensions.
Currently the financial dimensions on the production order header are defaulted to the picking list journal lines and takes precedence from any financial dimensions specified on the raw materials. If no financial dimension is on the production order header, then the financial dimension from th...
Thank you for your feedback. We are not considering the suggestion at this time due to the following reason:
The idea has not received enough votes since it was submitted 16-02-2019.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM, Microsoft
Adding constant scrap value on a route operation
In the Route the system allows you to put a scrap percentage per operation for variable scrap which is good. But I do not see where you can add a constant scrap value to the operation? For instance, we have an operation that generates 1,000 feet of constant scrap regardless of orde...
Thank you for your feedback. We have evaluated this Idea and declined it as there already is an option to specify constant scrap on the BOM-line. Using this option should fulfill the requirement of having a constant scrap of a material for one operation. It requires to connect the BOM-line to the operation.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM, Microsoft
Different Operation selected in RouteOpr form when select the operation by "Tab"
When selecting Operation in Operation relation by Tab button different operation is selected other than the one required.
Users are using tab to select and move to the next field in the form and this will get wrong information to be selected depends on the letters and numbers
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM,
Microsoft.
On the Batch balancing production (batch order), allow to use multiple times Release to warehouse button
Current design:
After initial release to warehouse after performing batch balancing process, there is no way to add additional formula lines/components to the batch order as the work for it will not be created and will result in the below error:
Thank you for your feedback.
Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM,
Microsoft.
Administrator
Thank you for your feedback. Currently this is not in our roadmap; however, we are tracking it and if we get more feedback and votes, we may consider it in the future.
Sincerely,
Johan Hoffmann
PM, Microsoft